Lexis®India Newsletter • Issue 22 • November 2017

Landmark Judgements 1. The Supreme Court of India, in Raptakos, Brett and Co. Ltd. vs. Ganesh Property, has held that  the possession of the Appellant-Company for the period under consideration, pursuant to orders passed by the High Court and this Court, cannot in any view be considered as illegal or unauthorized or that of a… Read More Lexis®India Newsletter • Issue 22 • November 2017

Lexis®India Newsletter • Issue 21 • November 2017

Landmark Judgements 1. The Supreme Court of India, in Adiveppa and Others vs. Bhimappa and Another, has held that it was obligatory upon the Plaintiffs to have proved that despite existence of jointness in the family, properties described in Schedule ‘B’ and ‘C’ was not part of ancestral properties but were their self-acquired properties. [(2017)… Read More Lexis®India Newsletter • Issue 21 • November 2017

Tribunal can now file contempt in relevant court against parties violating its orders

News Update Appeal to the Hon’ble Supreme Court arose from the judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 27 October, 2015 where the issue was that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court had construed section 27(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in a restrictive manner. In the present case, the interim order of the… Read More Tribunal can now file contempt in relevant court against parties violating its orders

Lexis®India Newsletter – Issue 19 • October 2017

Landmark Judgements 1. The Supreme Court of India, in Vasant Rao Guhe vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, had held that the prosecution has failed to prove beyond all reasonable doubt the charge of criminal misconduct under Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and punishable under Section 13(2) thereof against the Appellant/accused. [(2017)… Read More Lexis®India Newsletter – Issue 19 • October 2017

Lexis®India Newsletter – 16th August, 2017

Landmark Judgements 1. The Supreme Court of India, in State, represented by Deputy Superintendent of Police vs. K.N. Nehru etc., has held that Lower Courts had rightly directed further investigation to verify the genuineness or otherwise of the source(s) of income of Arun and his assets and the bearing thereof, if any, on the charge… Read More Lexis®India Newsletter – 16th August, 2017